1. I had mentioned earlier (in one of my posts below) that I am going to write about a CFD company that gave me a bad deal.
The name of the company is: Zeus Numerix. Essentially, what they did was to promise to pay me money verbally. (The promise came from Prof. Gopal Shevare, in front of several of his company engineers.) It would be for one month of work. Later on, one of them (Mr. Irshad Khan) thought that the assignment itself was not worth paying any money for. Accordingly, they paid me nothing. That is, absolutely, nothing. Zero. Simple.
If this is the understanding of trade and capitalism as IITians and IIT Bombay spin-offs keep, one would want the rest of the world to at least take notice of it.
But then, how about the rest of them? That brings us to the next episode of the weird/immoral companies…
2. Last week, I received an email receipt stating that Mr. Ashutosh Parasnis of PTC (the current MD of their Pune operations and a V/P of their USA company, I gather), had deleted without reading one of the emails that I had written to him—hold your breath—in April 2004. This is the only correspondence that I guess I have ever received from his desk.
The email in question that I wrote was an informative one, telling several respectable names from the IT industry in Pune, that I had thought (may be prematurely) that I might have found out a way to approach the P =? NP problem of computer science. I still am not sure how sound or unsound my logic is, because none ever responded to me.
Mr. Parasnis was then, and still is, listed as one of the office-bearers/committee-members of Computer Society of India, Pune chapter. See http://www.csi-pune.org/web/csi/management. He is also supposed to be active in US-India trade facilitating groups and all.
Here, I must wonder what relation he might have with anything to do in the CS field if he can’t make out that an email with P == NP? in its subject is something he ought to have read and responded to.
There are two BTWs to this point:
2.1 BTW, PTC of course has never responded to my resumes. One of their HR executives, one Mr. Chandak, was outright rude to me, in those times: 2003/2004. It has been fashionable for CAE software companies to keep harping that I am too old to be employed in a technical programming position and that I have no experience in CAE programming. If I point out that I have implemented an FEM solver (albeit a toy one—but enough powerful that all the pics on my home site were done up with it: http://www.JadhavResearch.info), they say that this doesn’t count, because I have not been paid for CAE software development before. Now, here is a twist to this story: One of my past colleagues (and a nice man himself), Mr. Ajay Deshpande, was hired by PTC, Pune, even if: (i) he too was not 30-minus and (ii) he too had 8+ years of experience—not just 5-7 years’, and (iii), and he too had no experience in CAE software development beforehand. (In fact, he was in QA.) What might explain this difference of treatment? That brings us to the BTW # 2.
2.2 BTW, if you are familiar with Maharashtrian surnames, please have a look at the CSI Pune chapter management, and count the number of Brahmins in it. Is my being a non-Brahmin an issue that comes in the way of my finding a job, in the IT field, in Pune?
In case you don’t know already. I myself do not believe in things like casteism or racism. (Many in Pune know this much about me. Drop a line and I will put in touch with one of them if you are interested.) The reason I don’t believe in these things is because I don’t believe in collectivism in any form. (For more on this, refer to Ayn Rand’s writings.)
3. Nope, weird/immoral things do not stop here. Just today, I got an email from ANSYS, telling me that: “This is your last chance to provide feedback regarding ANSYS Advantage magazine.” I had not been receiving any email from them for the past six eight months or so. Then how come I get this one so suddenly? It seems that someone must have noticed that I have mentioned ANSYS in my slides in my previous post (below). Now, what is so objectionable or weird about it? It’s just this: I have sent my resumes to ANSYS at least 3 times in the last 6 years—each time, in response to one of their marketing emails. (The first time I received one such an email from them was after one of those ISTAM conferences I had attended.) Fine. Nothing wrong in sending someone marketing or informative emails. I have been a marketing guy too. But then, I have also hired other people in my past experience. Accordingly, I also fail to understand what happens to my resumes. Both, to ANSYS, to Fluent India (right since the time that it was a separate company) and to Fluent as a part of ANSYS. Any answers, Amit Agrawal, Dr. Shane Moeykens?
—–
Apart from it all. If you think I am making my case worse for being hired in any job, ask yourself a simple question—And how much more time do you think should I have waited? Is 6.5 years of unemployment out of the recent 7 years, for a competent engineer like me, not enough? If so, what are your standards? Let me at least get your answer on the sort of standards you keep. In practice, that is.
And, BTW, these are not the only companies that have treated me in a weird or immoral way. (I do regard the treatment I received from Zeus Numerix as outright immoral.) That’s why, I have named this post as “Part I.”
Incidentally, despite CSI Pune management and the Pune IT industry (esp. that for s/w dev. in CAE, graphics, 3D rendering, etc.) being what it is, I still oppose reservations by caste in private industry in India—as a matter of principle. … I wish someone from them knew better—i.e. at least as well as I do. If you wanted to know the kind of standards I keep, well, this is one of them. (And, please spare me the question: “How.” Not that I don’t know it, but it’s just that I remember that I have been told in my last job by an associate degree holding American that I write too much in my e-Correspondences… Every Indian supported him. Even when I was giving just 3 line summaries to every email I wrote on the job. Anyway, let me stop. This can get long.)
More companies, and their unbelievable hiring practices, some time later.